The Four C’s: Convincing

Last week I introduced the qualities I call the Four C’s of Improvisation: a successful improvisation is competent, convincing, coherent and colorful. Last week I explored the area of competency, discussing knowledge of the organ, technical skills and musical formation. This week, we’ll look at how we can be convincing while living in the moment and being open to a future that of unknown possibilities.

Rhythm

Good public speaking requires fluidity. Words just roll off the tongue of good speakers. No hesitations. No ums or uhs. Even in conversation, unless we get interrupted, our thoughts generally flow from start to finish if we know what we intend to say. To be convincing, I believe improvisers must maintain the same rhythmic flow as good speakers. Any hesitancy makes our statement weaker. What’s the surest way to know a performer has made a mistake while playing a piece of repertoire? A disruption in the rhythm! (And no, rests are not necessarily a disruption in the rhythm. Plenty of good pieces make ample use of them.)

Thinking

When learning a written composition, we usually practice slowly, especially the difficult passages. This enables us to take the necessary time to read the music and find the notes without disrupting the flow. We need to do the same when improvising. One of the lessons I learned from Naji Hakim was “Never improvise faster than you can think.” If our rhythm hesitates, perhaps we are playing too quickly and need to slow our hands and feet down so that our brain can catch up. One of the surest ways to run into problems is to let our hands and feet wander aimlessly over the keyboard. While we might manage to be rhythmic, chances are our coherence may go out the window.

Conviction

There is no better way to be convincing than to play what we play with conviction. One of my favorite British entertainers is Derren Brown. On one of his TV series, he went to the track and through primarily a strong sense of conviction was able to collect winnings from losing bets. He even teaches someone else to do the same thing. (Watch the clip here.) On a visit to New York, he pays for food and jewelry with paper! While he employs a few other tricks, if he had any doubts or hesitation about what he was doing, his chance of success would drop precipitously. If we can make musical statements with as much conviction as Derren Brown uses words, lots of other details can be ignored while still providing an enjoyable experience to the listener.

To be convincing, we must improvise rhythmically, no faster than we can think and with conviction. The first two of these also help in being coherent, our topic for next week.

For this week, may all your improvs be convincing!

Glenn Osborne


 
Recent additions to organimprovisation.com:

Artists:

Themes:


 
Newsletter Issue 3 – 2014 05 12
See the complete list of past newsletter issues here.
Sign up to receive future issues using the box to the right on this page.

The Four C’s of Improvisation

For the month of May, I’d like to offer a little series on what I call the Four C’s of Improvisation. Every improvisation must be competent, convincing, coherent and colorful. Each week I’ll explore one of the topics and offer some guidance on ways to enhance the topic of choice through your practice.

The first ‘C’ is about being competent. This is perhaps the broadest area to cover and I feel aside from fear, the largest obstacle to improvising.

Competency at the Organ

Firstly, the improviser must know the instrument. It is perfectly acceptable to try out new registrations in practice, but pulling an untested combination of stops during a public improvisation can create problems: an intended solo may be too soft or may completely dominate the texture. This can force changes in form or loss of mental focus which can lead to many other difficulties.

Pushing an incorrect piston during an improvisation can be just as startling as doing so while performing a written composition. Many performers will practice a passage repeatedly in order to get the stop changes timed properly. If we are intentional about what we are improvising, we should be able to do the same sort of practice. Choose a texture to practice where you might like to change the registration and then repeat the idea until you are comfortable adding the stop(s), removing the stop(s), or pushing the piston, or perhaps all three! Perhaps the easiest way to get a registration changed is to include a rest, so don’t be afraid of the silence.

Technical Competency

Most of us probably started at the piano and went through a period of learning to play scales, arpeggios, chords and cadences. There are many piano technical method books out there (Hanon, Czerny, Schmitt, and Dohnanyi for example) and most organ method books include pedal exercises for beginners with a few other more advanced specific pedal technique books (Jones and Nilson for example). Having a fabulous musical idea but not being able to execute it can be the death of an improvisation. As I add to organimprovisation.com, I hope to present some exercises that can be practiced for technique, but will easily be adapted into musical compositions.

Musical Competency

Here is where formal instruction in harmony, counterpoint, and style are helpful. All of these skills can be practiced both at the organ and with pen and paper. An important skill for any improviser is knowing what the notes will sound like before you press the keys down. Completing pen and paper exercises can not only train you in harmony, counterpoint and form, but also develop your inner ear which can be most helpful should your fingers begin to wander! There are many websites now offering basic theory instruction. Some of the ones that seem most useful to me include: teoria.com, www.8notes.com, and www.berkleeshares.com. If you have or discover other on-line resources, please feel free to share with me so I can pass them along to everyone!

Next week, we’ll explore ways to be convincing while improvising.

May all your improvs be competent!

Glenn Osborne


 
Recent additions to organimprovisation.com:

Artists:

Themes:


 
Newsletter Issue 2 – 2014 05 05
See the complete list of past newsletter issues here.
Sign up to receive future issues using the box to the right on this page.

Richard Grayson

Richard Grayson
Website:
http://faculty.oxy.edu/rgrayson/

Professor of Music, Emeritus, Occidental College
Music Faculty, Crossroads School
Richard Grayson (born 1941) is an American composer and pianist. He is best known as an improvisor of classical music, most often with live-electronics. By the 1980s, he was regarded as one of the best non-jazz improvisers (Shulgold 1985). He was also organist at St. Martin of Tours Church, West Los Angeles until his retirement on May 31, 2009, after having served in that position for 28 years.

He offers an improvisation handbook for free download on his website here.

YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/user/improvelectronic/videos
While not improvisations at the organ, the collection of videos present wonderful demonstrations of different composer’s styles and how themes from one era can be treated in the style of a completely different composer.
Examples include:
“Singin’ in the Rain” in the style of Wagner
“Singin’ in the Rain” in the style of a Chopin Waltz
Moonlight Sonata in the Style of Khachaturian
Stravinsky’s “Rite of Spring” in the style of Mozart
Can Can in the style of Stravinsky
And this is only a sample!!!