The Four C’s: Convincing

Last week I introduced the qualities I call the Four C’s of Improvisation: a successful improvisation is competent, convincing, coherent and colorful. Last week I explored the area of competency, discussing knowledge of the organ, technical skills and musical formation. This week, we’ll look at how we can be convincing while living in the moment and being open to a future that of unknown possibilities.

Rhythm

Good public speaking requires fluidity. Words just roll off the tongue of good speakers. No hesitations. No ums or uhs. Even in conversation, unless we get interrupted, our thoughts generally flow from start to finish if we know what we intend to say. To be convincing, I believe improvisers must maintain the same rhythmic flow as good speakers. Any hesitancy makes our statement weaker. What’s the surest way to know a performer has made a mistake while playing a piece of repertoire? A disruption in the rhythm! (And no, rests are not necessarily a disruption in the rhythm. Plenty of good pieces make ample use of them.)

Thinking

When learning a written composition, we usually practice slowly, especially the difficult passages. This enables us to take the necessary time to read the music and find the notes without disrupting the flow. We need to do the same when improvising. One of the lessons I learned from Naji Hakim was “Never improvise faster than you can think.” If our rhythm hesitates, perhaps we are playing too quickly and need to slow our hands and feet down so that our brain can catch up. One of the surest ways to run into problems is to let our hands and feet wander aimlessly over the keyboard. While we might manage to be rhythmic, chances are our coherence may go out the window.

Conviction

There is no better way to be convincing than to play what we play with conviction. One of my favorite British entertainers is Derren Brown. On one of his TV series, he went to the track and through primarily a strong sense of conviction was able to collect winnings from losing bets. He even teaches someone else to do the same thing. (Watch the clip here.) On a visit to New York, he pays for food and jewelry with paper! While he employs a few other tricks, if he had any doubts or hesitation about what he was doing, his chance of success would drop precipitously. If we can make musical statements with as much conviction as Derren Brown uses words, lots of other details can be ignored while still providing an enjoyable experience to the listener.

To be convincing, we must improvise rhythmically, no faster than we can think and with conviction. The first two of these also help in being coherent, our topic for next week.

For this week, may all your improvs be convincing!

Glenn Osborne


 
Recent additions to organimprovisation.com:

Artists:

Themes:


 
Newsletter Issue 3 – 2014 05 12
See the complete list of past newsletter issues here.
Sign up to receive future issues using the box to the right on this page.

The Four C’s of Improvisation

For the month of May, I’d like to offer a little series on what I call the Four C’s of Improvisation. Every improvisation must be competent, convincing, coherent and colorful. Each week I’ll explore one of the topics and offer some guidance on ways to enhance the topic of choice through your practice.

The first ‘C’ is about being competent. This is perhaps the broadest area to cover and I feel aside from fear, the largest obstacle to improvising.

Competency at the Organ

Firstly, the improviser must know the instrument. It is perfectly acceptable to try out new registrations in practice, but pulling an untested combination of stops during a public improvisation can create problems: an intended solo may be too soft or may completely dominate the texture. This can force changes in form or loss of mental focus which can lead to many other difficulties.

Pushing an incorrect piston during an improvisation can be just as startling as doing so while performing a written composition. Many performers will practice a passage repeatedly in order to get the stop changes timed properly. If we are intentional about what we are improvising, we should be able to do the same sort of practice. Choose a texture to practice where you might like to change the registration and then repeat the idea until you are comfortable adding the stop(s), removing the stop(s), or pushing the piston, or perhaps all three! Perhaps the easiest way to get a registration changed is to include a rest, so don’t be afraid of the silence.

Technical Competency

Most of us probably started at the piano and went through a period of learning to play scales, arpeggios, chords and cadences. There are many piano technical method books out there (Hanon, Czerny, Schmitt, and Dohnanyi for example) and most organ method books include pedal exercises for beginners with a few other more advanced specific pedal technique books (Jones and Nilson for example). Having a fabulous musical idea but not being able to execute it can be the death of an improvisation. As I add to organimprovisation.com, I hope to present some exercises that can be practiced for technique, but will easily be adapted into musical compositions.

Musical Competency

Here is where formal instruction in harmony, counterpoint, and style are helpful. All of these skills can be practiced both at the organ and with pen and paper. An important skill for any improviser is knowing what the notes will sound like before you press the keys down. Completing pen and paper exercises can not only train you in harmony, counterpoint and form, but also develop your inner ear which can be most helpful should your fingers begin to wander! There are many websites now offering basic theory instruction. Some of the ones that seem most useful to me include: teoria.com, www.8notes.com, and www.berkleeshares.com. If you have or discover other on-line resources, please feel free to share with me so I can pass them along to everyone!

Next week, we’ll explore ways to be convincing while improvising.

May all your improvs be competent!

Glenn Osborne


 
Recent additions to organimprovisation.com:

Artists:

Themes:


 
Newsletter Issue 2 – 2014 05 05
See the complete list of past newsletter issues here.
Sign up to receive future issues using the box to the right on this page.

Sounds like a composition to me!

For me, there is nothing quite like creating something on the spot and then having someone walk up and ask who wrote the piece I just played. This can be even more amazing to me if the person starts speculating that it might have been one of the great composers: Bach, Mendelssohn, Frank, or even Messiaen. When the person learns it was an improvisation, they often offer up some expression of disbelief. Has this ever happened to you? I’d love to hear your stories about people’s reactions.

While imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, in music it can often be considered trite and artificial. How many of us have heard stories of assorted different themes being placed into Widor’s Toccata? As I never have actually learned the original, I can’t say that I’ve made the substitution there…. Regardless, I do think it can be a worthwhile skill to imitate other composers using either similar or new thematic material.

Much of my improvisation formation has been focused on learning to create my own style. Very little time was spent focusing on the style of any particular composer. While there are organists that improvise in different styles around, I feel like the current expectation is that to create music, even on demand, requires one to say something original. Treating a theme in the style of some other known composer even when well done seems to have the reputation of a party trick rather than a true skill.

Regardless of the reputation, I believe imitating well known composers is a valid avenue to learning the skills of improvisation. Recently I discovered a couple of pianists that improvise in the style of various classical composers. Jean-Jacques Hauser alias Tartarov debuted at the Tonhalle in Zurich in 1968 with improvisations in the style of Beethoven, Mozart and Liszt. Richard Grayson would take suggestions from the audience for both theme and subject before concluding his concerts with an improvisation. There are extensive collections of both available for viewing on YouTube. I, myself, got caught in a YouTube spiral when I found Grayson’s channel here. I’ve only just begun to explore Tartarov’s channel here. To get you started, I’ve included links for a video from each of them below. Let me know which one is your favorite!

Are there any composers that you are able to imitate well? How did you learn the style? Which composers would you like to be able to imitate? Your feedback will help me flesh out the website and will guide me in the resources I seek out or create.

Hoping your improvs sound like written pieces!

Glenn Osborne

TartarovChopinYouTube GraysonStravinskyMozart

 
Newsletter Issue 1 – 2014 04 21
See the complete list of past newsletter issues here.
Sign up to receive future issues using the box to the right on this page.